====================================================================== IBIS INTERCONNECT MODELING AD HOC TASK GROUP MEETING MINUTES AND AGENDA http://www.eda.org/ibis/adhoc/interconnect/ Mailing list: ibis-interconn@freelists.org ====================================================================== Next Meeting Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9 AM US Pacific Time Telephone Bridge Passcode 916-356-2663 5 988-5555 Use the LiveMeeting Links in Outlook or the information below: Meeting ID: 9a18c6926d9e49f88cf377a0bc86b49e Entry Code: h3KZqQEyM3U Location: meet:sip:michael.mirmak@intel.com;gruu;opaque=app:conf:focus:id:9a18c6926d9e49f88cf377a0bc86b49e%3Fconf-key=h3KZqQEyM3U Agenda: - Call for patents - Opens - Touchstone 2.0/3.0 Updated Text, Continued * Mixed-mode support * Wrapper or no? ====================================================================== Minutes from June 18: Attendees: ---------- (* denotes present) Agilent - Radek Biernacki*, John Moore, Ken Wong Ansoft - Denis Soldo Cadence Design Systems - Terry Jernberg, Brad Griffin Green Streak Programs - Lynne Green Hewlett-Packard - Rob Elliott Intel - Michael Mirmak Mentor Graphics Corp. - John Angulo*, Vladimir Dmitriev-Zdorov* Micron Technology - Randy Wolff* Sigrity - Sam Chitwood, Raymond Y. Chen, Tao Su, Brad Brim* SiSoft - Walter Katz* Teraspeed Consulting Group - Bob Ross* ======================================================================== No patents were announced. Discussion of the informal mixed-mode rules continued. Team members clarified that the proposed arbitrary ordering of mixed-mode and single-ended relationships still requires that *all* ports be included and described in *some* relationship (whether C, D or single-ended). Both Vladimir Dmitriev-Zdorov and Walter Katz commented that the new format is not per se "reduced" and any sparse matrix representation should be defined separately. Radek also reiterated that both C and D components are required for any mixed-mode port relationships. A brief discussion also occurred about "passivity" as a synonym for PCB, connector and cable interconnect applications. Bob Ross raised additional concerns, based on his IBIS Summit presentation, regarding the naming conventions used to express mixed-mode relationships (e.g., SDD11, etc.). The naming in the mixed-mode proposal may need to be adjusted to match this popular industry approach. Brad Brim noted that an additional column was used in previous proposals to give particular relationships a name. Work to continue in the next meeting. ======================================================================== Team Objectives: 1) complete ICM-IBIS linking BIRD and any associated changes to the ICM specification 2) update the ICM specification, if needed, to clarify the mapping of ICM nodes to S-parameter ports 3) complete a specification for "Touchstone Plus" or similar industry-standard definition for Touchstone-like files, to include complex impedance references, removal of limits on the maximum number of ports and per-port impedance references